From Evidence to Trust: Strengthening Climate MEL in Complex Transitions
Painel de Discussão | Online
-
Organizado por:
IPDET
Sobre o evento
Climate transitions are unfolding in contexts of high uncertainty, contested evidence, and increasing demands for transparency and trust. While data, analytical tools, and methodologies continue to expand, the core challenge remains how evidence is interpreted, shared, and used across complex systems involving multiple actors, interests, and power dynamics.
The Climate MEL Systems Academy is being launched this year in collaboration with several partners. Over the course of one week, participants will move from framing their climate challenge to applying advanced evaluation methods in practice, integrating systems thinking, political economy and climate finance.
The Glocal discussion will focus on “why the Climate MEL Systems Academy”, in the context of the evolving role of evaluators and MEL practitioners in navigating complexity, facilitating sensemaking, and strengthening the use of evidence in climate-related decisions. This panel will explore how monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) can move beyond the technical production of evidence toward supporting credible, trusted, and decision-relevant insights in climate action. Without focusing on specific technologies, the session will connect to the broader Glocal theme by reflecting on how trust in evidence is shaped not only by data quality, but also by processes of engagement, learning, and use across institutions and stakeholders.
Objectives
· Explore how Climate MEL can contribute to trust and credible evidence in complex transitions
· Reflect on the evolving role of evaluators in supporting decision-making and learning
· Share practical experiences on how evidence is interpreted, communicated, and used
· Foster dialogue across practitioners working at the intersection of evaluation, climate, and policy
Guiding Question
How can Climate MEL better support trusted, meaningful, and actionable use of evidence in complex climate transitions?
Target Audience
· Evaluation and MEL professionals (emerging to senior level)
· Commissioners, policy makers, and advisors
· Practitioners working in climate, environment, and development
· People interested in the Climate MEL discussion, including those exploring systems approaches and evidence use
The Climate MEL Systems Academy is being launched this year in collaboration with several partners. Over the course of one week, participants will move from framing their climate challenge to applying advanced evaluation methods in practice, integrating systems thinking, political economy and climate finance.
The Glocal discussion will focus on “why the Climate MEL Systems Academy”, in the context of the evolving role of evaluators and MEL practitioners in navigating complexity, facilitating sensemaking, and strengthening the use of evidence in climate-related decisions. This panel will explore how monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) can move beyond the technical production of evidence toward supporting credible, trusted, and decision-relevant insights in climate action. Without focusing on specific technologies, the session will connect to the broader Glocal theme by reflecting on how trust in evidence is shaped not only by data quality, but also by processes of engagement, learning, and use across institutions and stakeholders.
Objectives
· Explore how Climate MEL can contribute to trust and credible evidence in complex transitions
· Reflect on the evolving role of evaluators in supporting decision-making and learning
· Share practical experiences on how evidence is interpreted, communicated, and used
· Foster dialogue across practitioners working at the intersection of evaluation, climate, and policy
Guiding Question
How can Climate MEL better support trusted, meaningful, and actionable use of evidence in complex climate transitions?
Target Audience
· Evaluation and MEL professionals (emerging to senior level)
· Commissioners, policy makers, and advisors
· Practitioners working in climate, environment, and development
· People interested in the Climate MEL discussion, including those exploring systems approaches and evidence use
Orador/a
| Nome | Título | Biography |
|---|---|---|
| Ketevan Nozadze | Lead, Country Technical and Advisory Support, Global Evaluation Initiative (World Bank) | Ketevan leads country programmes on strengthening national monitoring and evaluation systems at the Global Evaluation Initiative. Her work focuses on supporting governments and civil society to strengthen M&E systems, with particular attention to climate change and environmental sustainability. |
| Tim Larson | President, Ross Strategic | Sounding Board Member, Climate MEL Academy | Tim works on strategic planning, evaluation, and collaborative processes across climate, energy, and sustainability. He supports international organisations, governments, and foundations in advancing partnerships and learning in complex climate systems. |
| Shawna Hoffman | Managing Director for Strategic Learning & Impact | The Rockefeller Foundation | Shawna Hoffman helps to shape and operationalize the Foundation's strategy for monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) across its programs and at the institutional level. She also oversees a body of work focused on Climate MEL field building. |
Moderators
| Nome | Título | Biography |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Candice Morkel | Head, International Program for Development Evaluation Training IPDET | Candice leads IPDET at the University of Bern and contributes to global training initiatives. She is a public policy and M&E specialist working on evaluation systems, capacity development, and the role of evaluation in supporting decision-making, including in climate and development contexts. |
Resumo
The discussion highlighted that climate transitions require MEL approaches that move beyond project-level assessment towards systems thinking, learning, and adaptation. Panelists emphasized that trusted evidence depends not only on methodological quality but also on co-creation, stakeholder engagement, and meaningful use. Participants explored how evaluators can evolve from evidence producers to facilitators of learning and sensemaking. The conversation also challenged traditional notions of attribution, proposing greater attention to contribution, additionality, and systems change. Across the discussion, trust, collaboration, and continuous learning emerged as essential conditions for effective Climate MEL.
Several practical areas for future work emerged, including strengthening Climate MEL competencies, developing learning-oriented and systems-aware approaches, improving connections between evidence and decision-making processes, and fostering collaboration among evaluators, governments, funders, and civil society. The session also generated a curated set of resources, evidence platforms, and evaluation approaches that will be shared with participants to support continued learning and application. Participants were invited to continue engaging through the Climate MEL Systems Academy and related IPDET activities.